Seres, Gyula (HU Berlin)
Balleyer, Anna (University of Groningen)
Cerutti, Nicola (Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change)
Friedrichsen, Jana (HU Berlin, FU Berlin, WZB Berlin and DIW Berlin)
Süer, Müge (HU Berlin)
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of mandatory face mask usage triggered a heated debate. A major point of controversy is whether community use of masks creates a false sense of security that would diminish physical distancing, counteracting any potential direct benefit from masking. We conducted a randomized field experiment in Berlin, Germany, to investigate how masks affect distancing and whether the mask effect interacts with the introduction of an indoor mask mandate. Joining waiting lines in front of stores, we measured distances kept from the experimenter in two treatment conditions – the experimenter wore a mask in one and no face covering in the other – in two time spans – before and after mask use becoming mandatory in stores. We find no evidence that mandatory masking has a negative effect on distance kept toward a masked person. To the contrary, masks significantly increase distancing and the effect does not differ between the two periods. However, we show that after the mandate distances are shorter in locations where more non-essential stores, which were closed before the mandate, had reopened. We argue that the relaxations in general restrictions that coincided with the mask mandate led individuals to reduce other precautions, like keeping a safe distance.
COVID-19; face masks; social distancing; risk compensation; field experiment; health policy
I12; D9; C93