Author:
Hufe, Paul (LMU Munich & ifo Institute)
Kanbur, Ravi (Cornell University)
Peichl, Andreas (LMU Munich & ifo Institute)
Abstract:
Empirical evidence on distributional preferences shows that people do not judge inequality as problematic per se but that they take the underlying sources of income differences into account. In contrast to this evidence, current measures of inequality do not adequately reflect these normative preferences. In this paper we address this shortcoming by developing a new measure of unfair inequality that reconciles two widely-held fairness principles: equality of opportunity and freedom from poverty. We provide two empirical applications of our measure. First, we analyze the development of inequality in the US from 1969 to 2014 from a normative perspective. Second, we conduct a corresponding international comparison between the US and 31 European countries in 2010. Our results document increasing unfairness in the US over time. This trend is driven by a strong decrease in social mobility that puts the “land of opportunity” among the most unfair countries in 2010.
Keywords:
inequality; equality of opportunity; poverty; fairness; measurement
JEL-Classification:
D31; D63; I32