B01
Competition and Incentives
Discussion Papers

Discussion Paper No. 1
January 7, 2017

You Owe Me

Author:

Klaus M. Schmidt (University of Munich)
Ulrike Malmendier (University of California at Berkeley)

Abstract:

In business and politics, gifts are often aimed at influencing the recipient at the expense of third parties. In an experimental study, which removes informational and incentive confounds, subjects strongly respond to small gifts even though they understand the gift giver’s intention. Our findings question existing models of social preferences. They point to anthropological and sociological theories about gifts creating an obligation to reciprocate. We capture these effects in a simple extension of existing models. We show that common policy responses (disclosure, size limits) may be ineffective, consistent with our model. Financial incentives are effective but can backfire.

Keywords:

gift exchange; externalities; lobbyism; corruption; reciprocity; social preferences;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

← Newer