Discussion Papers

Discussion Paper No. 303
November 29, 2021

Aiding Applicants: Leveling the Playing Field within the Immediate Acceptance Mechanism

Author:

Christian Basteck (WZB Berlin)
Marco Mantovani (University of Milan-Bicocca)

Abstract:

In school choice problems, the widely used manipulable Immediate Acceptance mechanism (IA) disadvantages unsophisticated applicants, but may ex-ante Pareto dominate any strategy-proof alternative. In these cases, it may be preferable to aid applicants within IA, rather than to abandon it. In a laboratory experiment, we first document a substantial gap in strategy choices and outcomes between subjects of higher and lower cognitive ability under IA. We then test whether disclosing information on past applications levels the playing field. The treatment is effective in partially reducing the gap between applicants of above- and below-median cognitive ability and in curbing ability segregation across schools, but may leave the least able applicants further behind.

Keywords:

laboratory experiment; school choice; immediate acceptance; strategy-proofness; cognitive ability; mechanism design;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 302

The Effects of an Increase in the Retirement Age on Health - Evidence from Administrative Data

Author:

Peter Haan (DIW Berlin, FU Berlin, Netspar)
Mara Barschkett (DIW Berlin, FU Berlin)
Johannes Geyer (DIW Berlin, Netspar)
Anna Hammerschmid (DIW Berlin)

Abstract:

This study analyzes the causal effect of an increase in the retirement age on health. We exploit a sizable cohort-specific pension reform for women using two complementary empirical approaches – a Regression Discontinuity Design and a Difference-in-Differences approach. The analysis is based on official records covering all individuals insured by the public health system in Germany and including all certified diagnoses by practitioners. This enables us to gain a detailed understanding of the multi-dimensionality in these health effects. The empirical findings reflect the multi-dimensionality but allow for deriving two broader conclusions. We provide evidence that the increase in the retirement age negatively affects health outcomes as the prevalence of several diagnoses, e.g., mental health, musculoskeletal diseases, and obesity, increases. In contrast, we do not find support for an improvement in health related to a prolonged working life since there is no significant evidence for a reduction in the prevalence of any health outcome we consider. These findings hold for both identifica- tion strategies, are robust to sensitivity checks, and do not change when correcting for multiple hypothesis testing.

Keywords:

Germany; retirement; pension reform; health; ICD-10; regression discontinuity design; difference-in-differences;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 301
November 19, 2021

Optimal Non-Linear Pricing with Data-Sensitive Consumers

Author:

Roland Strausz (HU Berlin)
Krähmer Daniel (University of Bonn)

Abstract:

We introduce consumers with intrinsic privacy preferences into the monopolistic non-linear pricing model. Next to classical consumers, there is a share of data-sensitive consumers who incur a privacy cost if their purchase reveals information to the monopolist. The monopolist discriminates between privacy types using privacy mechanisms which consist of a direct mechanism and a privacy option, targeting, respectively, classical and data-sensitive consumers. We show that a privacy mechanism is optimal if privacy costs are large and that it yields classical consumers a higher utility than data-sensitive consumers with the same valuation. If, by contrast, privacy preferences are public information, data-sensitive consumers with a low valuation obtain a strictly higher utility than classical consumers. With public privacy preferences, data-sensitive consumers and the monopolist are better off, whereas classical consumers are worse off. Our results are relevant for policy measures that target the data-awareness of consumers, such as the European GDPR.

Keywords:

optimal non-linear pricing; privacy; monopolistic screening;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 300
November 16, 2021

Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing Before and After Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines

Author:

Jana Friedrichsen (FU Berlin, HU Berlin, WZB Berlin, DIW Berlin)
Gyula Seres (HU Berlin)
Anna Balleyer (University of Groningen)
Nicola Cerutti (Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change)
Müge Süer (HU Berlin)

Abstract:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of mandatory face mask usage triggered a heated debate. A major point of controversy is whether community use of masks creates a false sense of security that would diminish physical distancing, counteracting any potential direct benefit from masking. We conducted a randomized field experiment in Berlin, Germany, to investigate how masks affect distancing and whether the mask effect interacts with the introduction of an indoor mask mandate. Joining waiting lines in front of stores, we measured distances kept from the experimenter in two treatment conditions – the experimenter wore a mask in one and no face covering in the other – in two time spans – before and after mask use becoming mandatory in stores. We find no evidence that mandatory masking has a negative effect on distance kept toward a masked person. To the contrary, masks significantly increase distancing and the effect does not differ between the two periods. However, we show that after the mandate distances are shorter in locations where more non-essential stores, which were closed before the mandate, had reopened. We argue that the relaxations in general restrictions that coincided with the mask mandate led individuals to reduce other precautions, like keeping a safe distance.

Keywords:

COVID-19; face masks; social distancing; risk compensation; field experiment; health policy;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 299
November 15, 2021

Expectation Management of Policy Leaders: Evidence from COVID-19

Author:

Andreas Peichl (LMU Munich, ifo Institute)
Peter Haan (FU Berlin, DIW Berlin)
Annekatrin Schrenker (FU Berlin, DIW Berlin)
Georg Weizsäcker (HU Berlin)
Joachim Winter (LMU Munich)

Abstract:

This paper studies how the communication of political leaders affects the expectation formation of the public. Specifically, we examine the expectation management of the German government regarding COVID-19-related regulatory measures during the early phase of the pandemic. We elicit beliefs about the duration of these restrictions via a high-frequency survey of individuals, accompanied by an additional survey of firms. To quantify the success of policy communication, we use a regression discontinuity design and study how beliefs about the duration of the regulatory measures changed in response to three nationally televised press conferences by Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Prime Ministers of the German federal states. We find that the announcements of Angela Merkel and her colleagues significantly prolonged the expected duration of restrictions, with effects being strongest for individuals with higher ex-ante optimism.

Keywords:

expectations; belief updating; covid-19; shutdown;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 298

Social Mobility in Germany

Author:

Dominik Sachs (LMU Munich)
Majed Dodin (University of Mannheim)
Sebastian Findeisen (University of Konstanz)
Luka Henkel (European Central Bank)
Paul Schüle (LMU Munich, ifo Institute)

Abstract:

We characterize intergenerational mobility in Germany using census data on educational attainment and parental income for 526,000 children. Our measure of educational attainment is the A-Level degree, a requirement for access to university. A 10 percentile increase in the parental income rank is associated with a 5.2 percentage point increase in the A-Level share. This parental income gradient has not changed for the birth cohorts of 1980-1996, despite a large-scale policy of expanding upper secondary education. At the regional level, there exists substantial variation in mobility estimates. Place effects, rather than sorting of households, account for most of these differences.

Keywords:

intergenerational mobility; educational attainment; local labor markets;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 297

Fostering the Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies: Evidence from the Licensing of the Transistor Patents

Author:

Monika Schnitzer (LMU Munich, CESifo, CEPR)
Markus Nagler (FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, CESifo, LASER)
Martin Watzinger (University of Muenster, CESifo, CEPR)

Abstract:

How do licensing and technology transfer influence the spread of General Purpose Technologies? To answer this question, we analyze the diffusion of the transistor, one of the most important technologies of our time. We show that the transistor diffusion and cross-technology spillovers increased dramatically after AT&T began licensing its transistor patents along with symposia to educate follow-on inventors in 1952. Both these symposia and the licensing of the patents itself played important roles in the diffusion. A subsequent reduction in royal- ties did not lead to further increases, suggesting that licensing and technology transfer were more important than specific royalty rates.

Keywords:

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 296

Malleability of Preferences for Honesty

Author:

Fabian Kosse (LMU Munich, briq)
Johannes Abeler (University of Oxford, IZA, CESifo)
Armin Falk (briq, University of Bonn)

Abstract:

Reporting private information is a key part of economic decision making. A recent literature has found that many people have a preference for honest reporting, contrary to usual economic assumptions. In this paper, we investigate whether preferences for honesty are malleable and what determines them. We experimentally measure preferences for honesty in a sample of children. As our main result, we provide causal evidence on the effect of the social environment by randomly enrolling children in a year-long mentoring programme. We find that, about four years after the end of the programme, mentored children are significantly more honest.

Keywords:

honesty; lying; truth-telling; formation of preferences; experiments with children;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 295

The Origins of Gender Differences in Competitiveness and Earnings Expectations: Causal Evidence from a Mentoring Intervention

Author:

Fabian Kosse (LMU Munich, briq)
Teodora Boneva (University of Bonn)
Thomas Buser (University of Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute)
Armin Falk (briq, University of Bonn)

Abstract:

We present evidence on the role of the social environment for the development of gender differences in competitiveness and earnings expectations. First, we document that the gender gap in competitiveness and earnings expectations is more pronounced among adolescents with low socioeconomic status (SES). We further document that there is a positive association between the competitiveness of mothers and their daughters, but not between the competitiveness of mothers and their sons. Second, we show that a randomized mentoring intervention that exposes low-SES children to predominantly female role models causally affects girls' willingness to compete and narrows both the gender gap in competitiveness as well as the gender gap in earnings expectations. Together, the results highlight the importance of the social environment in shaping willingness to compete and earnings expectations at a young age.

Keywords:

competitiveness; gender; socioeconomic status; inequality; earnings expectations;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 294

Earnings Information and Public Preferences for University Tuition: Evidence from Representative Experiments

Author:

Ludger Woessmann (LMU Munich, ifo Institute, CESifo)
Philipp Lergetporer (TU Munich, ifo Institute, CESifo)

Abstract:

Higher education finance depends on the public’s preferences for charging tuition, which may be partly based on beliefs about the university earnings premium. To test whether public support for tuition depends on earnings information, we devise survey experiments in representative samples of the German electorate (N>15,000). The electorate is divided, with a plurality opposing tuition. Providing information on the university earnings premium raises support for tuition by 7 percentage points, turning the plurality in favor. The opposition-reducing effect persists two weeks after treatment. Information on fiscal costs and unequal access does not affect public preferences. We subject the baseline result to various experimental tests of replicability, robustness, heterogeneity, and consequentiality.

Keywords:

tuition; higher education; information; earnings premium; public opinion; voting;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Older →← Newer