Discussion Papers

Discussion Paper No. 315
January 29, 2022

Perks and Pitfalls of City Directories as a Micro-Geographic Data Source

Author:

Thilo Albers (HU Berlin)
Kalle Kappner (HU Berlin)

Abstract:

Historical city directories are rich sources of micro-geographic data. They provide information on the location of households and firms and their occupations and industries, respectively. We develop a generic algorithmic work flow that converts scans of them into geo- and status-referenced household-level data sets. Applying the work flow to our case study, the Berlin 1880 directory, adds idiosyncratic challenges that should make automation less attractive. Yet, employing an administrative benchmark data set on household counts, incomes, and income distributions across more than 200 census tracts, we show that semi-automatic referencing yields results very similar to those from labour-intensive manual referencing. Finally, we discuss potential applications in economic history and beyond.

Keywords:

city directories; data extraction; granular spatial data;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 314
January 25, 2022

Anchored Strategic Reasoning

Author:

Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel (TU Berlin)
Gyula Seres (HU Berlin)

Abstract:

Anchoring is a robust behavioral phenomenon modeled predominantly as a bias in individual judgment. We propose a game-theoretic model that considers players’ beliefs about others’ behavior as a mediator for the effect of the anchor on a player’s choice. The results establish that anchoring in strategic interactions reported in the literature can be rationalized by anchored beliefs about the opponents’ intentions. Notwithstanding, we also demonstrate that a player might adjust away from rather than toward the anchor in games where choices are strategic substitutes.

Keywords:

anchoring bias; auctions; games; incomplete information; strategy;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 313
January 21, 2022

House Price Expectations

Author:

Niklas Gohl (DIW Berlin, University of Potsdam)
Peter Haan (FU Berlin, DIW Berlin, Netspar)
Claus Michelsen (DIW Berlin, Leuphana University Lueneburg)
Felix Weinhardt (European University Viadrina, DIW Berlin)

Abstract:

This study examines short-, medium-, and long-run price expectations in housing markets. We derive and test six hypothesis about the incidence, formation, and relevance of price expectations. To do so, we use data from a tailored household survey, past sale and rental offerings, satellites, and from an information RCT. As novel findings, we show that price expectations exhibit mean reversion in the long-run. Moreover, we do not find evidence for biases related to individual housing tenure decisions or regret aversion. Confirming existing findings, we show that local market characteristics matter for expectations throughout, as well as aggregate price information. Lastly, we corroborate existing evidence that expectations are relevant for portfolio choice.

Keywords:

housing markets; price expectations;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 312
January 20, 2022

Intertemporal Consumption and Debt Aversion: A Replication and Extension

Author:

Ciril Bosch-Rosa (TU Berlin)
Steffen Ahrens (FU Berlin)
Thomas Meissner (Maastricht University)

Abstract:

We replicate Meissner (2016) where debt aversion was reported for the first time in an intertemporal consumption and saving problem. While Meissner (2016) uses a German sample, our subjects are US undergraduate students. All of the main findings from the original study replicate with similar effect sizes. Additionally, we extend the original analysis by correlating a new individual index of debt aversion on individual characteristics such as gender, cognitive ability, and risk aversion. The findings suggest that gender and risk aversion are not correlated with debt aversion. However, cognitive ability is positively correlated with debt aversion. Overall, this paper confirms the importance of debt aversion in intertemporal consumption problems and validates the approach of Meissner (2016).

Keywords:

debt aversion; replication; experiment;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 311
January 18, 2022

Income Contingency and the Electorate’s Support for Tuition

Author:

Ludger Woessmann (LMU Munich, ifo Institute)
Philipp Lergetporer (ifo Institute, TU Munich)

Abstract:

We show that the electorate’s preferences for using tuition to finance higher education strongly depend on the design of the payment scheme. In representative surveys of the German electorate (N>18,000), experimentally replacing regular upfront by deferred income-contingent payments increases public support for tuition by 18 percentage points. The treatment turns a plurality opposed to tuition into a strong majority of 62 percent in favor. Additional experiments reveal that the treatment effect similarly shows when framed as loan repayments, when answers carry political consequences, and in a survey of adolescents. Reduced fairness concerns and improved student situations act as strong mediators.

Keywords:

tuition; higher education finance; income-contingent loans; voting;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 310
January 14, 2022

Experimenting with Purchase History Based Price Discrimination: a Comment

Author:

Michel Tolksdorf (TU Berlin)

Abstract:

Brokesova, Deck and Peliova [Int. J. Ind. Organ. 37 (2014) 229-237] have shown that comparative static results from two-period behavior-based pricing models hold in laboratory experiments, but they observed significant differences from point predictions. We report findings in conformity with these point predictions throughout a uniform pricing benchmark, a replication of Brokesova, Deck and Peliova’s behavior-based pricing treatment and a follow-up experiment. Reference dependence seems to shift participants’ second-period pricing behavior upwards. A post hoc analysis shows that considering myopic consumers instead of strategic consumers explains a downward shift of first-period prices and rationalizes the findings of Brokesova, Deck and Peliova. Volatile price levels affect price-based welfare measures such as sellers’ profits and customers’ total costs. We show that transport costs serve as a robust welfare measure, alleviating the impact of distorted prices. These findings are relevant for the design of experiments and when assessing the efficiency of experimental markets.

Keywords:

behavior-based price discrimination; pricing experiment;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 309
January 3, 2022

Can Schools Change Religious Attitudes? Evidence from German State Reforms of Compulsory Religious Education

Author:

Ludger Woessmann (ifo Institute, LMU Munich)
Benjamin W. Arold (ifo Institute, LMU Munich)
Larissa Zierow (ifo Institute, LMU Munich)

Abstract:

We study whether compulsory religious education in schools affects students’ religiosity as adults. We exploit the staggered termination of compulsory religious education across German states in models with state and cohort fixed effects. Using three different datasets, we find that abolishing compulsory religious education significantly reduced religiosity of affected students in adulthood. It also reduced the religious actions of personal prayer, church-going, and church membership. Beyond religious attitudes, the reform led to more equalized gender roles, fewer marriages and children, and higher labor-market participation and earnings. The reform did not affect ethical and political values or non-religious school outcomes.

Keywords:

religious education; religiosity; school reforms;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 308
December 27, 2021

The Bargaining Trap

Author:

Sebastian Schweighofer-Kodritsch (HU Berlin)

Abstract:

I revisit the Rubinstein (1982) model for the classic problem of price hag- gling and show that bargaining can become a “trap,” where equilibrium leaves one party strictly worse off than if no transaction took place (e.g., the equilibrium price exceeds a buyer’s valuation). This arises when one party is impatient about capturing zero surplus (e.g., Rubinstein’s example of fixed bargaining costs). Augmenting the protocol with unilateral exit options for responding bargainers generally removes the trap.

Keywords:

alternating offers; bargaining; time preferences; haggling costs; outside options;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 307
December 22, 2021

Strategy-Proof and Envy-Free Random Assignment

Author:

Christian Basteck (WZB Berlin)
Lars Ehlers (Université de Montréal)

Abstract:

We study the random assignment of indivisible objects among a set of agents with strict preferences. We show that there exists no mechanism which is unanimous, strategy-proof and envy-free. Weakening the first requirement to q-unanimity – i.e., when every agent ranks a different object at the top, then each agent shall receive his most-preferred object with probability of at least q – we show that a mechanism satisfying strategy-proofness, envy-freeness and ex-post weak non-wastefulness can be q-unanimous only for q ≤ n2 (where n is the number of agents). To demonstrate that this bound is tight, we introduce a new mechanism, Random-Dictatorship-cum-Equal-Division (RDcED), and show that it achieves this maximal bound when all objects are acceptable. In addition, for three agents, RDcED is characterized by the first three properties and ex-post weak efficiency. If objects may be unacceptable, strategy-proofness and envy-freeness are jointly incompatible even with ex-post weak non-wastefulness.

Keywords:

random assignment; strategy-proofness; envy-freeness; q-unanimity;

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Discussion Paper No. 306
December 1, 2021

Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at International Debating Competitions

Author:

Peter Schwardmann (Carnegie Mellon University)
Egon Tripodi (University of Essex, JILAEE)
Joël J. van der Weele (University of Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute)

Abstract:

Laboratory evidence shows that when people have to argue for a given position, they persuade themselves about the position’s factual and moral superiority. Such self-persuasion limits the potential of communication to resolve conflict and reduce polarization. We test for this phenomenon in a field setting, at international debating competitions that randomly assign experienced and motivated debaters to argue one side of a topical motion. We find self-persuasion in factual beliefs and confidence in one’s position. Effect sizes are smaller than in the laboratory, but robust to a one-hour exchange of arguments and a ten-fold increase in incentives for accuracy.

Keywords:

JEL-Classification:

Download:

Open PDF file

Older →← Newer